לד"ר ברנר

קראתי רבות בטיפולים משלימים שונים הממליצים על חוקן קפה. מה דעתך? למה ולמי בדיוק זה טוב? אולי יש לך גם נסיון בנושא ואם כן- האם אתה ממליץ (למי כן ולמי לא) תודה ושבת שלום

למה דווקא חוקן קפה והאם יש חשיבות לקפאין ולסוג הקפה? יש סוגים אחרים של חוקנים? האם זה עוזר להחלים מסרטן?

http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3219764,00.html

http://www.suradetox.com/images/Why/WhyColonic.gif http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/dco0049l.jpg 1: J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997 Jun;24(4):196-8. Colonic irrigation AND the theory of autointoxication: a triumph of ignorance over science. Ernst E. Autointoxication is an ancient theory based on the belief that intestinal waste products can poison the body AND are a major contributor to many, if not all, diseases. In the 19th century, it was the ruling doctrine of medicine AND led "colonic quackery" in various guises. By the turn of the century, it had received some apparent backing from science. When it became clear that the scientific rationale was wrong AND colonic irrigation was not merely useless but potentially dangerous, it was exposed as quackery AND subsequently went into a decline. Today we are witnessing a resurgence of colonic irrigation based on little less than the old bogus claims AND the impressive power of vested interests. Even today's experts on colonic irrigation can only provide theories AND anecdotes in its support. It seems, therefore, that ignorance is celebrating a triumph over science. J Altern Complement Med. 2006 May;12(4):389-93. Colonic irrigations: a review of the historical controversy AND the potential for adverse effects. Richards DG, McMillin DL, Mein EA, Nelson CD. Meridian Institute, Virginia Beach, VA, USA. Colonic irrigations enjoy widespread popularity among alternative medicine practitioners, although they are viewed with considerable skepticism by the conventional medical community. Although proponents make claims of substantial health benefits, skeptics cite the lack of evidence for health benefits AND emphasize the potential for adverse effects. Yet historically, there are clinical reports of effectiveness AND virtually no research refuting these reports. Instead there was a campaign against exaggerated claims by nonmedical practitioners that resulted in a movement away from this form of therapy without any scientific study of efficacy. Given the current popularity of colonic irrigations, it is important that such research be performed, which will require a quantitative estimate of the potential for adverse effects. Although there is little specific literature on colonic irrigations, a review of the literature on related procedures such as enemas AND sigmoidoscopies suggests that the risk of serious adverse effects is very low when the irrigations are performed by trained personnel using appropriate equipment. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/content/ETO_5_3X_Colon_Therapy.asp?sitearea=ETO

http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/709/693.html